• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Idelto

Cryptocurrency news website

  • About
  • Monthly analysis
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
  • Bitcoin/Ethereum
  • How to invest in cryptocurrencies
  • News

Proof of Reserves

Bitcoin Is A New World Country

24/05/2022 by Idelto Editor

Bitcoin’s enforceable signature verification creates new possibilities for seamlessly and privately expressing ownership of bitcoin to another counterparty.

Sam Abbassi is Founder and CEO of Hoseki, the proof-of-assets Bitcoin service.

De Soto Dreams Of Electric Money

Countries in the Global South are not poor because of culture, collective IQ, a lack of entrepreneurial spirit or market orientation; they are poor because they lack formal frameworks around property rights. Hernando de Soto discusses these topics at length in the “The Mystery Of Capital.” The ability to formalize and express ownership of property is at the foundation of capital and wealth generation, and if you think it has anything to do with culture, try (as de Soto puts it) jumping into a taxi in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, or walk through a bazaar in Tehran, Iran, or hustle your way to the Golden Temple in Amritsar, India without having someone try and strike up a deal with you. The notion that the people in these regions lack the creativity and the “right” culture to generate wealth is inhumane, absurd and entirely unconvincing. When you walk out the door of the Hilton hotel in Lima, Peru, you’re not leaving behind the wonderful world of mobile tech, antibiotics, internet and refrigeration. The people of Peru have all of those things. What you’re leaving behind is the magical world of legally enforceable transactions on property rights.

The unfortunate reality that exacerbates the condition of the people in these countries is that they are actually quite rich in their assets. The problem is that the assets in these regions are locked. Their citizens are unable to represent the assets they possess and they are unable to live the same invisible parallel lives that they are able to in the Global North. These assets, in effect, represent dead capital.

In the Global North, you can pledge your home for a loan, you can use credit ratings to get access to loans, you can hold stock in a company through legally enforceable contracts, enjoy limited liability and insurance policies, leverage property records that fix and store capital, all of which can be passed down to your heirs through hereditary succession. You can do all of these magical things in a world where the records of property you hold bestow upon you (the titleholder) and everyone else around you (other participants in the market) access to rights to general capital.

Bitcoin Is A Developing Country

Countries in the Global South don’t have these frameworks and neither does Bitcoin. Bitcoin suffers from much of the same malaise that inflicts contemporary developing countries such as massive migrations, explosions of extralegal activity, political and civil unrest and general discontent with an antiquated system. Our migrations are digital, our extralegal activity is dictated by the country we live in, political and civil unrests have a storied history that show no signs of abating and the antiquated system we are discontent with is maintained by a kleptocratic class of elites that expresses no accountability for those who enforce it.

The America of old (the America we love) itself used to be a developing country that, according to de Soto, was “trying to cope with the law and disorder of migrants, squatters, gold diggers, armed gangs, illegal entrepreneurs, and the rest of the colorful characters who made the settling of the American West so wild and, if only in hindsight, so romantic.” Like early American colonists, the prevailing system of English common law did not work. It didn’t take into account new forms of property access absent an established and generally accepted titling system. This was specifically a problem when it came to cases involving dubious titles. Property in England was so well formalized, demarcated and understood that there was no framework to handle newly-found or established property. The sheer abundance of land in British North America presented the first settlers with opportunities unfathomable back home in Europe — both in the collective psyche of the people and the law. Colonists ultimately formed their own rules that varied greatly by jurisdiction that expanded on the principles of English common law. This form of self-governance often clashed with the authorities, but as Peter Charles Hoffer emphasizes in “Law and People in Colonial America:” 

“In theory they were part of the king’s personal domain [and subject to his laws], but fact preempts theory. Far from England, thinly populated, rich in natural resources and occupied by men and women who knew their own minds and grasped a bargain when they saw it, the colonies edged towards self-government.” 

Ultimately, Western nations came to acknowledge social contracts born outside the official law as legitimate sources of law, making the law a tool that served popular capital formation and economic growth.

Bitcoin is at a similar point to where America was post its founding, and at the same point where developing countries are today.

Bitcoin brings Hernando de Soto’s dream to its ASIC-powered reality. Bitcoin is unique in that it natively enforces its own property rights without a monopoly on violence that enforces most other assets. Bitcoin is also without jurisdiction; its jurisdiction is cyberspace and it is not bound to the imagined boundaries that make up meatspace. What do you get when you have a jurisdiction-less asset, that enforces its own property rights irrespective of color, creed, country, language, sex or vaccination status? You get a new world.

That is what we see at Hoseki. We, like a lot of our friends — most likely including the reader — see a new world where the best money wins. We are tired of the vapid, soulless and amoral systems of money that pervade and dictate our current lives.

Human potential is limitless, and to limit it with monetary discretion and central planning is on the level of psychotic, if not genocidal. Bitcoin gives us a sound foundation to build on that avoids the pitfalls of systems of the past. It is through this foundation that we can generate sound capital. Unlike the current system which emboldens rampant debt, anesthetizes itself through bailouts for those closest to the system and sadistically brutalizes those on the fringes, Bitcoin offers something more. Bitcoin rewards good behavior, low time preference, high savings, planning and responsibility. Without strong incentives to exploit, we are embraced by a moralistic future with support beams built and maintained by a global collective, not a cabal of regional insiders. It offers a world that promotes saving for your future self and family, one that will connect you with your locality and allow you, your family and your community to plan for generations. Bitcoin promotes human potential through its emotionless enforcement of consensus-based rules that give us predictability, and by extension, reliability.

Hoseki Fixes This

Bitcoin has property rights built in. Much like services offered by brilliant Bitcoin companies today which utilize functionality that Bitcoin natively offers — namely multisignature custody quorums, Hoseki is also wrapping something that Bitcoin natively offers. After multisig, signature verification seems to be one of the most underrated functions that the Bitcoin protocol provides. We at Hoseki are taking the torch and expanding this core functionality. We want retail users to know that Bitcoin not only empowers you to be your own financial institution by taking custody of your own property, but it also allows you to express ownership over that property. A framework around expressing ownership of property is the foundational building block for robust property rights. It is also a way to unlock all of the capital that is currently captured in your stranded assets.

Hoseki is financial plumbing to seamlessly and privately express ownership of bitcoin to another counterparty. Proving ownership of an asset is a basic characteristic of any asset class, be it stocks, bonds, cash in your account or real estate. Much like our brethren in Peru, Egypt, Myanmar and Afghanistan, whose physical property is stranded, we are faced with a similar reality where our digital property, bitcoin, is stranded. Bitcoin is siloed off into exchanges, mobile wallets and hardware wallets. People hold bitcoin in different ways and in different places, and because of that, expressing ownership has become a challenge. There is no easy way for a broker, lender or underwriter to assess and verify your assets when you are trying to get a loan. You have the assets — they are quite valuable — yet you can’t get any service. You’re not expected to move or sell your stock holdings to fund your home purchase, but that stipulation exists when attempting to use bitcoin. This is particularly frustrating because you are holding the most pristine asset in existence, but much like property on the American frontier that hadn’t yet been formalized, bitcoin is missing a formal framework around expressing its natively-enforceable property rights.

Today you are shackled. Tomorrow you will be liberated. Hoseki is building a system that allows you to manifest the full potential of your bitcoin. It allows the world to benefit from Bitcoin, and it seeks to act as a bridge between the old world and the new as we shift to a global monetary regime run on a bitcoin standard.

This is a guest post by Sam Abbassi. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.

Filed Under: Bitcoin Magazine, Counterparty, culture, Developing Countries, English, Hoseki, Opinion, Proof Of Assets, Proof of Reserves

Bitcoin Continues To Flow Out Of Exchanges

20/04/2022 by Idelto Editor

Bitcoin is quickly leaving exchanges at a rate not seen in years, with almost 80,000 bitcoin being moved off platforms over the last 30 days.

The below is an excerpt from a recent edition of Bitcoin Magazine Pro, Bitcoin Magazine’s premium markets newsletter. To be among the first to receive these insights and other on-chain bitcoin market analysis straight to your inbox, subscribe now.

Coinbase April Outflows

As we’ve highlighted in previous analyses, the latest bitcoin outflow from exchanges has been relentless over the last month despite a lack of price appreciation. With March 2022 being the second-highest outflow month in bitcoin’s history, April has followed up with similar outflow strength so far. In our view, exchange balance outflows is one of the better metrics available for assessing current demand and accumulation sentiment.

Over the last 30 days, nearly 80,000 bitcoin, worth over $3 billion, has left exchanges with the largest outflows coming from Coinbase. Previous major 30-day outflows at this level have corresponded to price appreciation but now we are in a much more unique market structure.

(Source)
30-day sum of bitcoin exchange flows (bottom) and flows weighted by price (top)

When we talk about exchange balances, the majority of the market can be explained by trends in Coinbase and Binance, with both exchanges having over 20% of total known bitcoin exchange balances on their platforms, respectively. Together, they make up 48% of known bitcoin on exchanges. We rely on Glassnode’s heuristics and data science techniques to determine known exchange addresses and balances.

Bitcoin balance on various exchanges based on percentage each exchange holds

Coinbase reports a much higher number of bitcoin “assets on platform” as they also include the amount of bitcoin in their institutional custody services. At the end of last year, they reported over 2.4 million bitcoin on their platform.

(Source)

As for their exchange balances, the total bitcoin balance is down 8.63% year-to-date and down 39% since the peak in May 2020. We see this continued stair-step pattern over the last six months where large 10,000-plus chunks of bitcoin are being removed from the exchange at a time. Last Thursday was one of the largest one-day outflow days (in bitcoin-relative terms) over the last few years.

Bitcoin balance on Coinbase exchange

Filed Under: Binance, Bitcoin Magazine, Bitcoin Magazine Pro, Coinbase, English, Exchange, Exchanges, Markets, Proof of Reserves

Proof Of Reserves – The Making Of A Bitcoin Industry Standard

13/03/2022 by Idelto Editor

As we venture into the year 2022, Proof of Reserves is emerging from a niche concept into a fledgling industry standard.

In January 2020, Bitcoin Magazine published a description of “Why Proof of Reserves is Important to Bitcoin.”

The timing was no accident – the recent anniversary of the QuadrigaCX’s implosion kept fresh in many of our minds the risks we were striving to allay, especially here in Canada.

Two years might not sound like a long time to the average person, but it’s a significant stretch of history in the world of cryptocurrencies – it’s more than one-seventh of Bitcoin’s entire existence. By looking at industry progress in terms Proof of Reserves, we can see just how much can happen in that span of time.

Meager Beginnings

In that early 2020 piece, Mauricio Di Bartolomeo was joining the chorus of several voices already advocating for this opportunity to accelerate Bitcoin’s rise in legitimacy and professionalism.

Jason Tyra had written several pieces between 2014 and 2015. Steven Roose of Blockstream put forth some proposed standards in early 2019, soon advocated for by Matt ฿ on a personal blog post and Nic Carter had been banging his own drum, publishing several articles and podcast interviews on the topic, as well as using his extensive public reach to signal-boost the other advocates.

But real-world implementations were still thin on the ground, with little to show since 2014, when Kraken had sought to prove its reserves after the Mt. Gox debacle.

How exactly Proof of Reserves would emerge as a real-world phenomenon, remained to be seen.

Proof Of Reserve, No Matter The Reserve

Proof of Reserves is the extension of a rather simple observation; a service that holds a publicly validatable asset like bitcoin on behalf of clients, can choose to publish independently verifiable proof of the asset reserves in their possession.

One of the two challenges Iaid out in Bitcoin Magazine’s previous piece involved growing pressure on custodial services to lend out their assets in order to generate yield. Indeed, this practice has positively boomed in the past two years. Rather than being seen by the industry as a tempting vice to be resisted, many Bitcoiners have embraced the development and sought to earn interest on their assets.

An on-chain Proof of Reserves purist from years past might have been troubled by this trend, seeing it as an growing obstruction of the precise form of industry transparency to be desired. But the idea of verifiably-balanced assets and liabilities can be applied to more than just 100% reserve custodial models.

Indeed, in January 2021, Ledn became the first lender in the Bitcoin industry to offer Proof of Reserves as a service to its clients. By engaging with third-party accounting firm Armanino LLP, which produced an anonymized Merkle tree where each leaf represented a client balance, clients could individually verify through the third-party firm that their assets were indeed accounted for.

The case was made clear: Proof of Reserves is a viable feature for customers, no matter the reserve model.

Dominoes Begin To Fall

There had already been a modest start in 2020.

In May of that year, Gate.io provided proof of 100% collateral, the end result of a months-long effort beginning with a January 1 snapshot, and by September 2020, CoinShares was offering a real-time audit with Armanino as well.

But it was in 2021 that momentum really began to build.

As mentioned above, the year started with Ledn’s implementation, and the pace accelerated as the months wore on.

August was an eventful month in particular. Not only did Ledn make good on its intention to perform Proof of Reserves every six months by publishing its second attestation, but BitMEX entered the fray as the heaviest hitter yet (as measured by assets under management).

The BitMEX Research Desk published a characteristically thorough technical breakdown of the industry state of “proof of liabilities and assets,” and immediately followed BitMEX’s own demonstration of full reserves, independently verifiable by any customer with a modest amount of technical skill.

By September, Nexo joined Ledn as the second lender to offer an attestation with Armanino, this time with a rolling real-time implementation.

In early February this year, Kraken offered proof of their bitcoin and ether holdings totalling $19 billion, ending an 8-year hiatus from their first Proof of Reserves published in 2014.

Suddenly, Proof of Reserves isn’t just a twinkle in a visionary’s eye, or even an exceptional feature provided by an industry forerunner or two.

It is becoming a feature that clients can, and should, expect.

The Path Forward

Like Bitcoin itself, Proof of Reserves is much more than just a technological tool – it has ideological implications. It is the realization of the belief that transparency and individual verifiability is paramount, and that it need not end with self-custody.

If bitcoin is to become a global money, there will be custodians. There will be lenders. They fulfill essential roles on the road to mass adoption. Open-source wallets and specialized hardware are incredible developments for self-sovereignty and their importance should not be understated. But they will never comprise the entirety of Bitcoin’s economic activity.

Bitcoin’s openness and auditability allows its users to demand more transparency from bitcoin service providers. Instead of resigning ourselves to the risks inherent in custodial models, we can strive to standardize solutions and mitigations to alleviate those risks and ultimately help to drive faster and broader adoption.

Demanding Proof of Reserves from the services you use is one of the most powerful ways to do just that.

This is a guest post by Mario Gibney. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Filed Under: audit, Bitcoin Magazine, business, English, Opinion, Proof of Reserves

Customers Can Now Verify Kraken’s Bitcoin Reserves

03/02/2022 by Idelto Editor

The company recently passed an independent audit on its bitcoin holdings and has enabled a ‘Proof of Reserves’ feature to its customers.

Kraken customers can now independently verify that the bitcoin funds they hold on the cryptocurrency exchange are backed by actual assets after the firm launched its Proof of Reserves feature, enabling a new level of transparency and accountability to emerge in the industry.

The feature is the product of an independent, cryptographic audit of Kraken’s funds performed by accounting firm Armanino LLP, which verified the amount of bitcoin the exchange holds on behalf of its clients with the help of Merkle Trees.

“Indeed, in this audit, completed on December 31, our auditor determined Kraken controlled all of the bitcoin…belonging to clients on our exchange, as well as all the bitcoin…held in our industry-leading on-chain and off-chain staking services,” the company said in a Thursday statement.

Users interested in verifying that Kraken holds the amount of bitcoin that the company claims to hold on their behalf can do so by accessing the independent Proof of Reserves website by Armanino. But first, they should head over to Kraken’s website to gather the necessary information, a unique identification number for their account, for accessing the records.

“An advanced cryptographic accounting procedure conducted semi-annually by trusted auditors, Proof of Reserves lets you verify that Kraken is meeting rigorous standards for accountability and exceeding the transparency offered by legacy financial firms,” per Kraken’s website.

Proof of Reserves enables greater transparency by providing customers with the ability to check if the custodian of their bitcoin is truthful. The feature isn’t completely trustless, however, as strictly speaking, the user still needs to trust the third-party company that performed the audit.

But the initiative is still positive, as it prevents the cryptocurrency exchange from embarking on fractional reserves, and it is also a better deal than what is offered by traditional banks, who not only do fractional reserves but involve full trust.

Filed Under: Bitcoin, Bitcoin Magazine, business, English, Kraken, News, Proof of Reserves

‘Who Holds All the Bitcoin’ List Debunked — Without Cryptographic Proof No BTC Ownership Claim Holds Water

27/09/2021 by Idelto Editor

Who Holds All the Bitcoin List Debunked — Without Cryptographic Proof No BTC Ownership List Holds Water

A web portal that displays a list of alleged owners of all the bitcoin in the world has been shared a great deal since China cracked down on crypto trading last week. The web portal claims that the Chinese government owns 194,775 bitcoin that reportedly stem from the Plustoken crypto scam. The problem with the list’s sources is that the ownership verification is highly inconclusive and doesn’t offer much of anything aside from speculation.

Does China or Bulgaria Really Hold Billions in Bitcoin?

Ever since China made a few statements concerning citizens dealing with cryptocurrency via offshore exchanges and explaining that the process is illegal, a web page with a list called “Who Holds All The Bitcoin?” has been shared all over social media and cryptocurrency forums.

The reason people share it is because they speculate that China is banning bitcoin, while at the same time hoarding 194,775 bitcoins from the Plustoken crypto scam. The list of who owns all the bitcoin also provides a link to sources, and the China source stems from an article published by theblockcrypto.com on November 27, 2020.

The source the website uses is an article written by Wolfie Zhao and the editorial is called “Chinese police have seized $4.2 billion cryptos from Plustoken Ponzi crackdown.” The article also contains a court judgment order which explains the case details and lists the conspirators involved.

While the article and the judgment order note that the Chinese government did seize various quantities of bitcoin, ethereum, litecoin, and other tokens, it does not necessarily mean that the Chinese government still holds these crypto assets. There is no hard evidence that the Chinese government holds approximately 194,775 BTC today.

The Chinese government would have to prove ownership, and it won’t, and there’s no way of telling whether or not the nation-state sold the assets. It may be possible for blockchain surveillance trackers (blockchain parsers) to at least get a glimpse at whether or not it is even worth pondering. The Chinese government would have to either make a public display and move the coins so the world can see or prove ownership of the funds by using the private key and signature verification.

If the Chinese government source is considered legitimate, then people could also assume that Bulgaria owns 213,519 bitcoin. There are plenty of articles regarding the mystery behind the Bulgarian government seizing these coins, but to this day, it is still debatable as to whether or not they are still owned by Bulgaria.

Evidence shows it is very likely that Bulgaria auctioned the 200K BTC stash, yet some still believe it is owned by the Bulgarian government. It is also assumed that the government in Ukraine owns 46,351 bitcoin but that figure only comes from public disclosure forms that derive from Ukrainian civil servants.

Cryptographic Verification and Proof of Reserves

There is no way of verifying whether or not the Chinese government or Bulgarian government still owns any of these bitcoins that were seized from criminal actions. Again, China or Bulgaria would have to prove ownership in a public manner or prove they could move these funds. The countries could sign a message tied to a specific address that held the said quantity of bitcoin, but no government would do this.

Some of the sources on the list of who owns all the bitcoin derive from tweets and other articles tied to the likes of Tim Draper and Michael Saylor. Unless these individuals prove ownership by moving the said quantities of bitcoin or they sign a message tied to the crypto asset’s private key, a list of these people with approximate bitcoin holdings is meaningless.

Ownership and proving true proof of reserves is quite easy in the world of bitcoin with a private key and signature. Someday, proof of reserves in bitcoin, by signature, will likely be relied on more heavily as the years transpire, because you can’t take a government’s word for it or some individual on social media saying they own thousands of bitcoin. Bitcoin proponent Nic Carter discusses the importance of proof of reserves in an editorial that highlights:

Proof of Reserves + Proof of Liability = Proof of Solvency

In the introduction to the proof of reserves subject, Carter notes that “if there’s a single thing I could do to better this industry, it would be to convince every custodial service provider in the cryptocurrency space to adopt a routine Proof of Reserve program.” Proof of reserves can be done with bitcoin (and other crypto assets) by pretty much any individual or organization that exists today. Without proof of reserves, everything else is mere speculation, hearsay, and unverified evidence.

This would include every crypto custodian that doesn’t deploy a proof of reserve method or a claimant that simply says they own a quantity of bitcoin. Just as we would not accept an individual that claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto without verified cryptographic proof, the same can be said about these lists of so-called bitcoin owners. Fact is, without cryptographic proof, every ‘who owns bitcoin’ list can be called into question, and dismissed as mere speculation.

What do you think about lists of bitcoin owners claiming to show specific ownership and approximate quantities of bitcoin owned by individuals or organizations? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Filed Under: Bitcoin Bulgaria, Bitcoin Ownership, bitcoin treasuries, BTC Ownership Lists, Bulgaria Bitcoin, China, China Bitcoin, Chinese Bitcoin holdings, Cryptographic Verification, English, List Debunked, michael saylor, News, News Bitcoin, nic carter, Private Key, Proof of Reserve program., Proof of Reserves, Signature, Tim Draper, Ukraine Bitcoin, Who Holds All the Bitcoin

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Archives

Recents articles

  • A Day In The Life Of A Bitcoin Core Developer
  • Study: AUM of Crypto Investment Products at Record Lows in June, Trust Products Garner Lowest Total Since December 2020
  • Bitcoin Is A New Paradigm Of Stakeholder Capitalism
  • US Regulator Charges South African MTI and Its Operator With $1.7 Billion Fraud Involving Bitcoin
  • Just As The Harlem Globetrotters Changed Basketball Forever, The Perth Heat Can Change Sports Forever With Bitcoin
  • Crypto Exchange Coincoinx to Launch Crypto to Fiat Payments App in Venezuela
  • Reusing Bitcoin Addresses Can Lead To Private Keys Being Stolen
  • TSX-Listed Voyager Digital ‘Temporarily’ Suspends Trading, Deposits, and Withdrawals

© 2022 · Idelto · Site design ONVA ONLINE

Posting....